Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 Pa. Super. 92 - Commonwealth v. Rush

281 Pa. Super. 92 - Commonwealth v. Rush’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 1983
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Wilson · Commonwealth ex rel. Robinson v. Myers · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Mullins v. Maroney · Commonwealth v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 1405. Sentencing Proceeding At the time of sentencing, the judge shall: (c) advise the defendant on the record: (2) of the right to file motions challenging the propriety of the sentence ... (3) of the ten (10) day time limit within which such motions must be filed; (5) that only claims raised in this court may be raised on appeal;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A motion to modify sentence shall be in writing and shall be filed with the sentencing court within ten (10) days after imposition of sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.