Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 S.C. 525 - Main v. Corley

Main v. Corley’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2019

21 state decisions

1101984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams Ex Rel. Estate of Jackson v. Chesterfield Lumber Co. · Shropshire v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judge is not required to single out some one morsel of evidence and attach to it great significance when patently the evidence is introduced solely in a vain attempt to create an issue of fact that is not genuine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.