Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 SO2D 445 - Wolf v. State

Wolf v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2000

12 state decisions

601973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · United States v. Harris · 70 Cal. 2d 97 - Stapleton v. Superior Court · United States v. Bell · People v. Fierro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The general rule is stated in 22 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 295(3) (1961) in a headnote as follows: An accused may not properly be prosecuted for two offenses with relation to narcotics where both arise out of the same transaction and one is necessarily incident to the other, but where the same transaction gives rise to separate and distinct offenses, a prosecution for one will not ordinarily bar prosecution for the others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.