281 So. 2d 924 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2014
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Johnson · United States v. Hugh Howard Polk and Deloy Duett Polk · Pettus v. S Tate · 247 So. 2d 697 - Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a person has knowledge from facts and circumstances which should convince a reasonable person that property has been stolen, in such situation the rule is that in a legal sense he knew the property was stolen. Pettus v. State, 200 Miss. 397, 410 , 27 So.2d 536, 540 (1946). [ 281 So.2d at 926 ].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where property is stolen in another state or country and brought into this state, or is stolen in one county in this state and carried into another, the offender may be indicted and tried in any county into or through which the property may have passed, or where the same may be found.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hooghe v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.