Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

281 S.W.3d 927

State v. Helm

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2009

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2009-04-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2012

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-04-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Eric Helm appeals his conviction and sentence after a jury found him guilty of four counts each of first-degree robbery and armed criminal action, and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/281/sw3d/927 · .json · Public domain