Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 U.S. 206 - Wilbur v. United States ex rel. Kadrie

Wilbur v. United States ex rel. Kadrie’s Empirical Analysis

281 U.S. 206 · 1930

Citation profile

593
cited by 593 later decisions
27
cited 27 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

223 federal appellate · 128 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 593 later decisions (27 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Mead Corp. (2001), Virginian Ry Co v. System Federation No 40 (1937)

223 federal appellate · 128 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 14 states

14801930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Noble v. Union River Logging Railroad · Tiger v. Western Investment Co. · Knight v. United Land Ass'n · Work v. United States Rives

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 593 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Mandamus is employed to compel the performance, when refused, of a ministerial duty, this being its chief use. It also is employed to compel action, when refused, in matters involving judgment and discretion, but not to direct the exercise of judgment or discretion in a particular way nor to direct the retraction or reversal of action already taken in the exercise of either.” (Emphasis ours.)”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “From what has been said it follows that the case is not one in which mandamus will lie.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.