Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 U.S. 271 - Meadows v. United States

Meadows v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

281 U.S. 271 · 1930

Citation profile

132
cited by 132 later decisions
9
cited 9 times by the Supreme Court
September 1979
most recently cited

64 federal appellate · 21 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 132 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1979 · most notably Lynch v. United States (1934), Dismuke v. United States (1936)

64 federal appellate · 21 district ·

51019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Meadows (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on White v. United States · Silberschein v. United States · Aetna Life Insurance v. Dunken · United States v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the event of disagreement as to claim, * * * under a contract of insurance between the Veterans’ Administration and any person or persons claiming thereunder an action on the claim may be brought against the United States either in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or in the district court of the United States in and for the district in which such persons or any one of them resides, and jurisdiction is conferred upon such courts to hear and determine all such controversies.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the ground that the applicant, at'the -■ ; time of making .the application, was - totally and permanently disabled; and, that section 19 of the World War Veterv.ans’ .'Act of 1924, as amended, 38 U.S: CA.,. §- 445, which confers jurisdiction upon the District Courts to hear and determine controversies arising out of claims under contracts of insurance in • the event of disagreement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The right to reinstatement, when it exists, flows from the statutory provision and not from any undertaking expressed in the contract of insurance ... a reinstatement under the provisions of the statute would be not the fulfillment of a contractual obligation, but, in effect the making of a new contract by statutory sanction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.