Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 U.S. 339 - United States v. Worley

United States v. Worley’s Empirical Analysis

281 U.S. 339 · 1930

Citation profile

365
cited by 365 later decisions
27
cited 27 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

166 federal appellate · 36 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 365 later decisions (27 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2011 · most notably Lowden v. Northwestern Nat Bank & Trust Co of Minneapolis Minn (1936), United States v. Bodcaw Co. (1979)

166 federal appellate · 36 district · 24 state decisions

1190193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc. · United States v. Mayer · Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United States · Georgia Railroad & Banking v. Redwine · White v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 365 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the absence of a statute directly authorizing it, courts will not give judgment against the United States for costs or expenses.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.