Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 Va. 374 - Startin v. Com.

Startin v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Conyers v. MARTIAL ARTS WORLD OF RICHMOND · Ansell v. Commonwealth · Armstrong v. Commonwealth · Johnson v. Commonwealth · Holloman v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the term 'firearm' includes any instrument that is capable of expelling a projectile by force of gunpowder [and] also includes other objects that are not capable of firing projectiles but give the appearance of being able to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n its outward appearance, including size, weight and shape it appears to be an operational firearm designed to expel .45 caliber ammunition by explosion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “replica [that] ha[d] the same size, weight and shape of an operational firearm designed to expel .45 caliber ammunition by explosion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.