Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 Va. 455 - Howard v. Com.

Howard v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Moore v. Arizona · Charles v. Com. · Stephens v. Commonwealth · Arogas v. Frederick Bd. of Zoning Appeals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant's right to a speedy trial is one accorded him under the [S]ixth [A]mendment of the United States Constitution and under article I, section 8 of the Virginia Constitution. This right has been supplemented by Code §§ 19.2-241 and 19.2-243, held to be a legislative interpretation of what constitutes a speedy trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he provisions of paragraph 4 of Code § 19.2-243 ... clearly demonstrate that in order to avoid the tolling provision, the defendant must be adverse to the granting of the continuance and must affirmatively express his objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “entered by the court sua sponte ... are subject to the same requirements regarding objections [by the defendant] as other continuances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.