Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 281 Va. 622 - Burton v. Com.

Burton v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ridley v. Commonwealth · Johnson v. Commonwealth · Clark v. Com. · Jones v. Com. · Preston v. Com.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a statute makes an offense consist of an act combined with a particular intent, proof of such intent is as necessary as proof of the act itself and must be established as a matter of fact. Intent is the purpose formed in a person's mind ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Intent is the purpose formed in a person's mind which may, and often must , be inferred from the facts and circumstances in a particular case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The state of mind of an alleged offender may be shown by his acts and conduct,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.