Baldwin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

cited by 98 later decisions

states following

December 2003

most recently cited

98 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably 585 So. 2d 112 - Ex Parte Bankhead (1991), 425 So. 2d 500 - Gwin v. State (1982)

98 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Nichols v. State · Aaron v. State · Knight v. State · Boulden v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“some tendency to prove or disprove some disputed or material issue”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 527 So. 2d 784 - Grice v. State · 555 So. 2d 772 - Siebert v. State
“"The right to protection against an unlawful search is personal, and a defendant in a criminal case who denies any proprietary or possessory interest in seized property has no standing to object to the method of seizure. Shurman v. United States (5th Cir.), 219 F.2d 282 ; United States v. Serrano (2nd Cir.), 317 F.2d 356 ; Williams v. United States (10th Cir.), 323 F.2d 90 ; United States ex rel. Smith v. Reincke, D.C., 239 F.Supp. 887 ."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Hodges v. State · 48 Ala. App. 446 - Davidson v. State
“Courts and juries cannot be too squeamish about looking at unpleasant things, objects or circumstances in proceedings to enforce the law and especially if truth is on trial. The mere fact that an item of evidence is gruesome or revolting, if it sheds light on, strengthens or gives character to other evidence sustaining the issues in the case, should not exclude it.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 536 So. 2d 123 - Malone v. State · 955 So. 2d 1037 - Adams v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.