Robinson v. Shock’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Wright v. Keffer (1995), Campbell v. State (1989)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Malloy v. Hogan · Commercial Printing Co. v. Lee · State Department of Public Welfare v. Lipe ex rel. Atracner · Mitchell v. State · Minetree v. Minetree
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[[juvenile offenders are not adult offenders and are not treated as such.. . . [T]he entire process and the purpose of the juvenile code set it apart from the criminal code and many of the considerations involved in dealing with juvenile offenders are significantly different.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The safeguards for due process and subsequent relief that have developed around the criminal process are not as available to [civilly committed] state hospital inmates, or to juvenile offenders committed to the custody of the state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cleveland v. Frazier“juvenile offenders are not adult offenders and are not treated as such.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. LH v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.