Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 F.2d 386 - Johnson & Johnson v. Picard

Johnson & Johnson v. Picard’s Empirical Analysis

282 F.2d 386 · 1960

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
December 1996
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 1996

13 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1201960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hoffman v. Blaski · Fourco Glass Company v. Transmirra Products Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.