Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 F.2d 494 - Pasley v. Overholser

Pasley v. Overholser’s Empirical Analysis

282 F.2d 494 · 1960

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 1982
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 1982 · most notably Honeycutt v. Ward (1979), Richard Bellew v. J. B. Gunn (1976)

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

160196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Sanders v. Allen · United States v. Sturm · Powers v. Hunter · Hodges v. United States · A. E. Staley Mfg. Co. v. Kipton Elevator Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While lapse of time alone may not warrant denial of the issuance of the writ, it is certainly true that one who attacks the validity of his plea of guilty so long after the proceedings in the (Trial) Court must carry a heavy burden if he is to overcome the regularity of his conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.