Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

282 F.2d 831

Docket No. 15678.

English v. Cunningham

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1960-06-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1960

1 federal appellate ·

4 counsel of record

Relies on Milone v. English

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1960-06-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Messrs. Edward Bennett Williams, Raymond W. Bergan and Harold Ungar, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

¶2Mr. Seymour Spelman, Alexandria, Va., was on the pleadings for appellees Boggia and others.

¶3Messrs. J. Parker Connor and Eugene F. Mullin, Jr., Washington, D. C., for Lawrence T. Smith, Monitor.

¶4Messrs. Herbert J. Miller, Jr., Raymond G. Larroca and Joseph DuCoeur, Washington, D. C., for Board of Monitors.

¶5Before Edgerton, Wilbur K. Miller and Fahy, Circuit Judges in Chambers.

¶6*832PER CURIAM.

¶7In view of the judgment of this court entered this day in Milone v. English, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 349, 282 F.2d 832, from which it follows that the alleged vacancy in the Monitorship to which Terence F. McShane was sought to be appointed did not exist, it is

¶8Ordered by the court that the filing in the District Court on April 1, 1960, of an Oath of Office as a Monitor, executed by Terence F. McShane, apparently consequent upon a letter of appointment, is held for naught.

/282/f2d/831 · .json · Public domain