Mende v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
282 F.2d 881 · 1960
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2006 · most notably United States v. Porth (1970), United States v. Knohl (1967)
25 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 18 U.S.C. § 3288 · 28 U.S.C. § 1732
Relies on Robinson v. United States · Ilseng v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations has expired”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(the) underlying concept of § 3288 is that if the defendant was indicted within time, then approximately the same facts may be used for the basis of any new indictment within the next term, if the earlier indictment runs into legal pitfalls.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.