Reese v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis
282 F.3d 1184 · 2002
Citation profile
33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
August 2011
most recently cited
18 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Anders v. California · Coleman v. Thompson · Jones v. Barnes · William O'sullivan v. Darren Boerckel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the opportunity to read . . . the lower [Oregon] court decision claimed to be in error before deciding whether to grant discretionary review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“by assuming that Reese's petition by itself did not properly alert the Oregon Supreme Court to the federal nature of Reese's claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`opportunity to . . . correct' alleged violations of its prisoners' federal rights,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baldwin v. Reese
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.