Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 F.3d 268 - Smyth ex rel. Smyth v. Rivero

Smyth ex rel. Smyth v. Rivero’s Empirical Analysis

282 F.3d 268 · 2002

Citation profile

181
cited by 181 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

74 federal appellate · 14 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 181 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Planned Parenthood Minnesota v. Rounds (2008), Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Department of Energy (2002)

74 federal appellate · 14 district · 10 state decisions

1310200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (§ 801 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Pierce v. Underwood · Farrar v. Hobby · Buckhannon Board and Care Home Incs v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 181 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We doubt that the Supreme Court's guidance in Buckhannon was intended to be interpreted so restrictively as to require that the words `consent decree' be used explicitly.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[t]he term 'prevailing party,' as used in ... fee-shifting provisions is a 'legal term of art,' and is 'interpreted ... consistently'-that is, without distinctions based on the particular statutory context in which it appears.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] court's responsibility to ensure that its orders are fair and lawful stamps an agreement that is made part of an order with judicial imprimatur.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.