Burroughs v. Makowski’s Empirical Analysis
282 F.3d 410 · 2002
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Simpson v. Jones · Couch v. Jabe · Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Lesyshen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failed to `meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D)'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hicks v. Straub · Munson v. Kapture“the Michigan Court of Appeals and Michigan Supreme Court's statements that Burroughs was not entitled to relief under M.C.R. 6.508(D) presents a sufficient explanation that their rulings were based on procedural default”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Munson v. Kapture“undisputed that Burroughs failed to properly present his arguments for state appellate review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hicks v. Straub
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.