Duckett v. Quick’s Empirical Analysis
282 F.3d 844 · 2002
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 15 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2022 · most notably Welding Services, Inc. v. Forman (2007), Crawford v. Jackson (2003)
9 federal appellate · 15 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Bearden v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“either totally lacking in evidentiary support or . . . so irrational as to be fundamentally unfair.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“task is limited to deciding the minimum requirements of due process. They include (a) written notice of the claimed violations of parole; (b) disclosure to the parolee of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a ‘neutral and detached’ hearing body such as a traditional parole board, members of which need not be judicial officers or lawyers; and (f) a written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking parole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was represented by counsel at the revocation hearing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crawford v. Jackson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.