Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 F.3d 902 - United States v. Ware

United States v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis

282 F.3d 902 · 2002

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably United States v. White (2007), United States v. Davis (2005)

21 federal appellate · 1 district ·

210200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Monge v. California · Monge v. California · Ray v. United States · United States v. Beddow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an appellate court may decline to hear a substantive challenge to a conviction when the sentence on the challenged conviction is being served concurrently with an equal or longer sentence on a valid conviction.” United States v. Ware, 282 F.3d 902, 906 (6th Cir.2002) (quoting Dale v. Haeberlin, 878 F.2d 930 , 935 n. 3 (6th Cir.1989)). Hence, we could have declined to review Lacefield’s multiplicity claim except for the fact that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “will sustain a jury's guilty verdict so long as, `after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.