Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 F.3d 991 - United States v. Guy

United States v. Guy’s Empirical Analysis

282 F.3d 991 · 2002

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
June 2012
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1365 (Federal Anti-Tampering Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2119 · 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553

Relies on Koon v. United States · Buford v. United States · Hebert v. Brown · McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission · United States v. Werlinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ijnjury involving extreme physical pain or the protracted impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; or requiring medical intervention such as surgery, hospitalization, or physical rehabilitation. In addition, “serious bodily injury” is deemed to have occurred if the offense involved conduct constituting criminal sexual abuse under 18 U.S.C. § 2241 or § 2242 or any similar offense under state law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`serious bodily injury' means conduct other than criminal sexual abuse, which already is taken into account in the base offense level.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The deeming provision, in combination with the restriction in § 2A3.1, appears to have been intended to make an enhancement for serious bodily injury automatically available if the offender’s conduct underlying his conviction for another type of offense also involved crimi nal sexual abuse, but not if the conviction is for sexual abuse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.