Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

282 F. App'x 259

Jarvis v. Astrue

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2008

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-06-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2012

1 district ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2008-06-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Reginald E. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his race discrimination claim, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jarvis v. Astrue, No. 1:05-cv-02950-CCB, 2007 WL 2332694 (D.Md. July 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/282/fappx/259 · .json · Public domain