Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 FSUPP 240 - Frazier v. Lane

Frazier v. Lane’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
March 1970
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Fay v. Noia · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California · Coppedge v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any kind of screening procedure by which an indigent defendant such as petitioner herein must first run the gauntlet of a preliminary showing of merit before a person who, at best, stands in the position of amicus curiae, clearly does not come up to the standard demanded by the equal protection clause. The deficiency is not solved by allowing the Indiana Supreme Court to review the response and report of a public defender who has refused representation of an indigent defendant for the reason that there simply has been no representation by one acting as an active advocate. 282 F.Supp. at 245 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.