Scully v. Berryhill’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Sullivan v. Zebley · Sims v. Apfel · Rosa v. Callahan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Selian v. Astrue , 708 F.3d 409 , 417 (2d Cir. 2013) (per curiam) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); accord Greek v. Colvin , 802 F.3d 370 , 374-75 (2d Cir. 2015) (per curiam); see generally 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Conetta v. Berryhill“20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520 (a)(4)(ii), 416.920(a)(4)(ii), which is an impairment or combination of impairments that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Conetta v. Berryhill“permissible, provided the ALJ supports this determination elsewhere in his or her opinion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Conetta v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.