Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Jones v. State · State v. Eubanks · Dickens v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[decisions on requests to charge involve trial tactics to which we must afford substantial latitude, and ‘they provide no grounds for reversal unless such tactical decisions are so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have chosen them.’ . . . (Cit.)” [Cit.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sigman v. State“Neither appellant has shown how he was misled to his prejudice by any alleged imperfection in the indictment and we can discern no prejudice in either record. Any error in failing to try appellants upon a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. LAW v. the STATE.“indictment was, thus, manifestly harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. LAW v. the STATE.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.