State v. Hemdani’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2024
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Nash v. State · Goodman v. Davis · King v. State · Byrd v. Shaffer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The record shows undisputedly that the trial court did not fully inform Brown of his Boykin rights on the record during the plea hearing. Moreover, the statement by Brown's counsel at the hearing in which counsel acknowledged having advised Brown of his”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State“some affirmative evidence that either the trial court or trial counsel entered into a colloquy with defendant and explained all three of his Boykin rights. [Cit.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State“that the trial court entered into [a] colloquy with [Brown] to ensure that he read and fully understood the [waiver of rights] agreement which he signed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.