Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 Ga. 784 - Jones v. State

Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2025

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

120200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Chimel v. California · Ring v. Arizona · Griffin v. Wisconsin · Hurtado v. People of the State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is nothing in Georgia law that creates a blanket authorization for warrantless searches of probationers’ homes based on less than probable cause, this statute clearly attempts to severely limit probationers’ rights against arrest, even at home without a warrant, based on less than probable cause. The statutory limitation of rights is subject only to constitutional limitations, and... the constitutional limitations themselves are affected by the statute’s existence. The statute places probationers on notice that their rights have been limited and, in turn, diminishes their expectation of privacy. 22”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the State, which bears the burden of proving the legality of the search of [Evans’s residence], failed to show the existence of any law, legally authorized regulation, or sentencing order imposing any limitation on [Evans’s] Fourth Amendment right against warrantless searches of his residence at the time of the search. 20”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “not only failed to place Jones on notice that he had a diminished expectation of Fourth Amendment privacy at the time of the search in question, those orders affirmatively suggested precisely the opposite.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.