Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 Ga. 9 - Allen v. Wright

Allen v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably You v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (2013), Mason v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (2008)

4 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

230200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320D (§ 1178 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood · Abdulkadir v. State · State v. Fielden · 162 Ga. App. 677 - Orr v. Sievert · Alexander Properties Group, Inc. v. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “HIPAA and the related provisions established in the Code of Federal Regulations expressly supercede any contrary provisions of State law except as provided in 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-7 (a) (2). Under the relevant exception, HIPAA and its standards do not preempt state law if the state law relates to the privacy of individually identifiable health information and is “more stringent” than HIPAA’s requirements. “More stringent” means laws that afford patients more control over their medical records.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The doctrine of separation of powers is an immutable constitutional principle which must be strictly enforced. Under that doctrine, statutory construction belongs to the courts, legislation to the legislature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he principle of 'expressio unius est exclusio alterius' makes it impossible for the courts to rewrite OCGA § 9-11-9.2 so as to incorporate the missing ... requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.