Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chatman v. Mancill · 252 Ga. App. 900 - Kilpatrick v. State · Shaw v. State · 225 Ga. App. 324 - Randolph v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Absent such notice, the provisions of OCGA § 17-16-4 (a) do not apply.) (punctuation and footnote omitted); see also Hall v. State , 282 Ga. App. 562 , 564 (2), 639 S.E.2d 341 (2006) (physical precedent only) (accord). OCGA § 17-16-4 (c) provides as follows:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“written notice to the prosecuting attorney that such defendant elects to have this article apply to the defendant's case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.