282 Ga. App. 884 - Threatt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · In re Draffin · Chapel v. State · Chatman v. Mancill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“These factors, individually, are neither necessary nor sufficient by themselves to find that the appellant’s due process rights were violated; rather, these factors should be considered together in a balancing test weighing the conduct of the State and the appellant contributing to the delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Singleton v. State“appellate delay is prejudicial when there is a reasonable probability that, but for the delay, the result of the appeal would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.