Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 Ga. App. 884 - Threatt v. State

282 Ga. App. 884 - Threatt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · In re Draffin · Chapel v. State · Chatman v. Mancill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “These factors, individually, are neither necessary nor sufficient by themselves to find that the appellant’s due process rights were violated; rather, these factors should be considered together in a balancing test weighing the conduct of the State and the appellant contributing to the delay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “appellate delay is prejudicial when there is a reasonable probability that, but for the delay, the result of the appeal would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.