Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 ILLAPP 252 - Weisbrod v. Lowitz

Weisbrod v. Lowitz’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
February 1986
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1986

7 state decisions

30193519401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glen v. Dodson · Link, Petter & Co. v. Pollie · 235 Ill. App. 132 - Weber v. Rupp · 274 Ill. App. 280 - Taft v. Otte & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Plaintiff’s right to recover is purely statutory, hence all the conditions upon which that right is based must be complied with before a recovery can be had. The statute contemplates that tender must be made of the stock sold unless this is excused by the action of the other party which led to an exchange.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.