State v. Gary’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably Bellamy v. State (2007), State v. Foster (2010)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Koon v. United States · Minnesota v. Murphy · Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad · Babe Houser Motor Co. v. Tetreault · Cheadle v. New Mexico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““because this issue is jurisdictional in that it goes to the power of the district court to revoke probation, the argument that a particular result seems to defy common sense is not persuasive. As the Court of Appeals explained below, ‘the undesirability of a result does not allow us to craft language onto a statute that is not already there.’ [State v. Gary,] 34 Kan. App. 2d [599,] 602[, 121 P.3d 1000 (2005)]. Thus, any discontent relating to the district court’s jurisdiction in this matter should be brought before the legislature, not the courts.” 282 Kan. at 241 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Skolaut
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.