Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

282 Kan. 38

144 P.3d 48

State v. Marsh

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 18, 2006

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 2006-10-18

Relies on Kansas v. Marsh · Harris v. United States · State v. Marsh

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-10-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2025

4 state decisions

20200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1 In State v. Marsh, 278 Kan. 520, 102 P.3d 445 (2004), we affirmed appellant’s convictions and sentences for first-degree premeditated murder and aggravated burglary. We reversed appellant’s convictions for capital murder and aggravated arson after holding the trial court committed reversible error by excluding circumstantial evidence connecting a third party, the victim’s husband, to the crimes. A majority of the court also held that the weighing equation, K.S.A. 21-4624(e), was unconstitutional on its face under tire Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

¶2 The Supreme Court of the United States granted appellee’s petition for writ of certiorari, 544 U.S. 1060, 161 L. Ed. 2d 1109, 125 S. Ct. 2517 (2005), and later reversed this court’s holding that K.S.A. 21-4624(e) is unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163, 165 L. Ed. 2d 429, 126 S. Ct. 2516 (2006).

¶3 That part of our decision in State v. Marsh which held K.S.A. 21-4624(e) unconstitutional under tire Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution is hereby vacated. Our decision in Marsh reversing appellant’s convictions for capital murder and aggravated arson and affirming appellant’s convictions and sentences for first-degree premeditated murder and aggravated burglary remains unchanged. The case is remanded with directions to grant appellant a new trial on the capital murder and aggravated arson charges.

¶4 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

/282/kan/38 · .json · Public domain