Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 Minn. 13 - Chapman v. State

Chapman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2018 · most notably Jenkins v. Delaware (1969), Beltowski v. State (1971)

72 state decisions

210196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Northeast Airlines, Inc. · 67 Cal. 2d 9 - People v. Doherty · 3 Md. App. 11 - Boone v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court shall allow a defendant to withdraw a plea of guilty upon a timely motion and proof to the satisfaction of the court that withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice. Such a motion is not barred solely because it is made after sentence. If a defendant is allowed to withdraw a plea after sentence, the court shall set aside the judgment and the plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “are not disposed to encourage accused persons to “play games” with the courts * * ⅜ by setting aside judgments of conviction based upon pleas made with deliberation and accepted by the court with caution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We have refused to order vacation of a plea of guilty when manifest injustice has not been demonstrated. We have held that delay in seeking relief is a relevant consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.