Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 NJSUPER 307 - State v. Piemontese

State v. Piemontese’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1996
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boyle v. Landry · 280 F. Supp. 938 - Landry v. Daley · State v. Lashinsky · Trice v. City of Pine Bluff · 13 Pa. Commw. 425 - Sobocinski v. City of Williamsport

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A violation of an ordinance should not depend upon which enforcement officer, or for that matter which judge,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.