Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 Or. 93 - Elam v. Soares

Elam v. Soares’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 1986
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mount v. Welsh · Fromme v. Lang & Co. · Cleveland Oil Co. v. Norwich Ins. Society · Durkee v. Carr · Edwards, Guardian v. Hoevet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: (5) Recorded recollection. A memorandum or record concerning a matter about which a witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection to enable him to testify fully and accurately, shown to have been made or adopted by the witness when the matter was fresh in his memory and to reflect that knowledge correctly. If admitted, the memorandum or record may be read into evidence but may not itself be received as an exhibit unless offered by an adverse party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.