Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 ORAPP 845 - State v. Stewart

State v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “would permit the jury to find that defendant possessed the methamphetamine with the intent to sell it. The trial court denied defendant's motion. The jury found defendant guilty of unlawful delivery”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Well, I can give you some incentive and we can stay up.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “violation constitutes delivery or manufacture”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.