Cosar v. Bemo’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2006
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Putnam v. Pacific Monthly Co. · Atchison & Eastern Bridge Co. v. Miller · Northern Arizona Supply Co. v. Stinson · 77 Ga. App. 406 - Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Patterson · Hazelrigg Trucking Co. v. Duvall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is a well recognized principle of appellate review that a party should not be allowed to take advantage, on appeal, of an error he has invited at the trial; and the ‘fact that the * * * statement of facts not in evidence was provoked or invited by the adverse counsel has often been held to excuse the error.’ ” (citing cases)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sisler v. Whitten““If this were not the rule, one party’s counsel would have unlimited license to prejudice the jury against his opponent’s side of the case, and, if retaliatory measures were taken, keep obtaining additional trials until the verdict was satisfactory to him.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ * * * This court has held that in cases of the latter class, it must appear ‘quite plainly’ that the verdict was influenced by the retaliatory remarks before it will be set aside on account thereof. * * * ” (citing cases)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sisler v. Whitten
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.