Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 P.2d 255 - Gonzalis v. Lynch

Gonzalis v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1976
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Patterson · Ex Parte Lancaster · 84 Okla. Crim. 211 - Perry v. State · 39 Okla. Crim. 310 - McCurdy v. State · 63 Okla. Crim. 125 - Ex Parte Warrenburg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * A change of jurisdiction must come by reason of the accused’s application for a change of venue, after the issues are joined and the case ready for trial. It has been held that jurisdiction over the cause is one thing; the power and duty to find a new bill of indictment upon whose charges that cause shall be tried, is another and totally distinct and different thing. State v. Patterson, 73 Mo. 695 . There is a dearth of authority on this question but the cases have been collected and discussed in 18 A.L.R. 706 , Ex parte Lancaster, 206 Ala. 60 , 89 So. 721 , wherein the Alabama court said: ‘The removal of an indictment to another county for trial does not deprive the grand jury of the county where the crime was committed of jurisdiction to find a new indictment in case the first one is dismissed for any cause.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.