282 Pa. Super. 82 - Commonwealth v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
May 1996
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Weeks v. United States · Burdeau v. McDowell · Commonwealth v. Story · Commonwealth v. Murray · Commonwealth v. Papszycki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Limited to matters in dispute. Where only a particular item, claim or assessment adjudged in the matter is involved in an appeal, . . . the appeal . . . shall operate to prevent the lower court ... . from proceeding further with only such item, claim or assessment, unless otherwise ordered ... as necessary to preserve the rights of the appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Act of 1972 at 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5702 stated that: “A person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he: (1) intercepts without permission of the parties to the communication a message or other communication by telephone or telegraph...””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.