Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 S.C. 448 - Bartles v. Livingston

Bartles v. Livingston’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2018

18 state decisions

801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Camden v. Mayhew · Mishoe v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. · Dunkley v. Van Buren · Zorn Ex Rel. Estate of Zorn v. Crawford · Baker v. Weaver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absent grounds to set aside the decree of foreclosure, there is no discretion to cut off the right to a deficiency after sale where (1) the complaint in the foreclosure action asks for personal judgment, (2) the amount of the debt is fixed in the foreclosure decree, and (3) the sale is insufficient to satisfy the entile debt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “If we were bound to conform our opinions strictly to the arguments and reasoning of the parties, the result would often be bad decisional law.... To confine ourselves solely to the reasoning of the parties would be an abdication of our duty as judges to decide cases independently and impartially in accordance with the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “When this Court construes an exception, it will make its construction as liberal as the language will allow, in order to decide the question involved, unless it is satisfied that the statement has misled the respondent to his prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.