Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 SW2D 624 - Turner v. Lewis

Turner v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2016

6 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

701955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eutsler v. Huff · Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Spradlin · Blair v. Boggs · Colley v. Commonwealth · Glover's Administrator v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the employer retains the right to control the work and the manner in which it is done, those doing the work are servants. On the other hand, if an employee has the right to control the manner of work and the right to determine the means by which results are accomplished, he is deemed an independent contractor and the employer is not responsible for his negligence. Blair v. Boggs, Ky., 265 S.W.2d 795 ; Eutsler v. Huff, 222 Ky. 48 , 299 S.W. 1070 ; Glover’s Adm’r v. James, 217 Ky. 572 , 290 S.W. 344 ; Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Spradlin, 176 Ky. 405 , 195 S.W. 781 . In each of these cases it was pointed out that the lessor of a coal mine was not responsible for the negligent acts of his lessee where the latter had control of the mine.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.