Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 U.S. 509 - Alward v. Johnson

Alward v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

282 U.S. 509 · 1931

Citation profile

133
cited by 133 later decisions
46
cited 46 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 6 district · 66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 133 later decisions (46 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2019 · most notably James v. Dravo Contracting Co. (1937), Indian Motocycle Co. v. United States (1931)

12 federal appellate · 6 district · 66 state decisions — followed in 21 states

920193119401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell · Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Knox · Railroad Company v. Peniston · New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessments · Hopkins v. Southern California Telephone Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 133 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The distinction between property employed in conducting a business which requires constant and unusual use of the highways and property not so employed is plain enough.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Nor do we think petitioner’s property was entitled to exemption from state taxation because used in connection with the transportation of the mails. There was no tax upon the contract, for such carriage; the burden laid upon the property employed affected operations of the federal government only remotely.” (p. 514.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.