¶1No. —, original.
¶2Mr. H. Ely Goldsmith, pro se.
¶3The motions for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and for leave to proceed in- forma pauperis are denied.
282 U.S. 799
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1930-10-20
Cited by 5 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1939
1 counsel of record
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1930-10-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1No. —, original.
¶2Mr. H. Ely Goldsmith, pro se.
¶3The motions for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and for leave to proceed in- forma pauperis are denied.