282 U.S. 812
Docket No. 546.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdictional statement submitted January 19, 1931.
Decided January 26, 1931.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1931-01-26
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1935
2 federal appellate ·
1 counsel of record
Relies on Zucht v. King · Sugarman v. United States · State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas (United States, Intervener)
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1931-01-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Mr. Arthur I. Moulton for appellant. Messrs.• I. H. Van Winkle, Charles A. Hart, and Charles E. McCulloch for appellee.
¶3The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question, Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.