282 U.S. 813
Docket No. 547.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdictional statement submitted January 19, 1931.
Decided January 26, 1931.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1931-01-26
1 counsel of record
Relies on Zucht v. King · Sugarman v. United States · State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas (United States, Intervener)
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1931-01-26
Cited by 12 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1975
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Mr.- Arthur I. Moulton for appellant. Mr. I. H. Van Winkle for appellee.
¶3The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.