Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 282 Va. 227 - Turner v. Com.

Turner v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2019

11 state decisions

1102011decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haskell v. Commonwealth · Wooden v. Commonwealth · Heacock v. Commonwealth · Carpitcher v. Com. · Lewis v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a new witness has been found, who has not previously testified and who could not with due diligence have been discovered before the conviction became final, reference to the circuit court for an evidentiary hearing might be appropriate because of a trial judge's unique ability to see and hear the witness first hand and to evaluate his credibility from his appearance and demeanor while testifying. Witnesses who testified at the original trial, but later decide to recant their testimony, stand on a different footing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the petitioner has not met his burden ... because ... relief [on a petition for a writ of actual innocence is available] only to those individuals who can establish that they did not, as a matter of fact, commit the crime for which they were convicted and not to those who merely produce evidence contrary to the evidence presented at their criminal trial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to be 'material' within the meaning of Code § 19.2-327.11(A)(vii), evidence supporting a petition for a writ of actual innocence based on non-biological evidence must be true.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.