Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

283 A.D.2d 660

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2001-05-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2004

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-05-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered February 15, 2000, convicting him of criminally negligent homicide, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

¶2Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

¶3*661The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of criminally negligent homicide is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Krausman, J. P., S. Miller, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

/283/ad2d/660 · .json · Public domain